Critical Thinking Assignment Essay

Common Humanism with respect to the subject of cause, appears to lean toward the assurance â€Å"that matter has consistently existed and given sufficient opportunity and possibility, the final product is the thing that you see around you today.† (Weider, Gutierrez 64). There is an absence of proof that God exists and man is seen rather as a machine, having no influence over their reality and once man’s life has reached a conclusion, this machine closes (65). Humanists answer inquiries of personality by accepting that, â€Å"mankind is a result of transformative forces† (66). Humankind is seen as a progressively refined creature, anyway humankind isn't of higher caliber over the collective of animals. The responses to the topic of significance or reason for existing is, best case scenario, replied based on their significance (68). It is up to that person to give any obvious advantage to their life, by having an effect in their life (69). Through this, they can ma ke an understood and sure effect in another people life. Nonetheless, since â€Å"man is a machine and at last not in charge of what occurs, life can't have any genuine worth or significance.† (69). Profound quality and morals asks what is ethically and morally right versus wrong and how an individual should live, at that point God must exist to convey what is good and bad (71). That being along these lines, mainstream humanism doesn't put stock in a God, and nor does He exist. Common Humanists accept that there is no â€Å"absolute truth†, and depends intensely on the way that â€Å"truth is reliant upon the individual or society and is liable to change† (71). Common Humanism isn't stressed over the topic of predetermination. When an individual has passed on, the only thing that is in any way important is the thing that they did on this planet and having any kind of effect in another person’s life (73). The Biblical/Christian perspective, in contrast with mainstream humanism on the topic of starting point, is through belief in higher powers. (65). Through God, and under one God, everything exists. While the mainstream humanist has no confidence in God and man has no control a lot of like a machine, belief in a higher power trusts â€Å"God is the primary reason, the response to why there is some different option from nothing† (65). The topic of character through mainstream humanism believesâ mankind and the collective of animals are of equivalent worth, the Biblical/Christian perspective accepts that humankind is over the creatures, and we are mindful to deal with them (69). While common humanists place man and his motivation through affecting others in their lives, the Biblical/Christian perspective accepts our motivation is having an individual relationship with God and His Son, Jesus Christ (70). While common humanists have no shared concurrence on the topic of profound quality, and reject â€Å"the outright truth†, and relies upon our general public, the Biblical/Christian perspective bases ethical quality or morals through â€Å"Special Revelation† (72). The requirement for reclamation must occur as we were totally conceived in transgression, and we must be spared through Jesus Christ (72). Humankind isn't worried about fate, through a mainstream humanist conviction. While, the Biblical/Christian perspectives on predetermination is â€Å"dependent upon a person’s decisions and their own relationship with God† (75). Works Cited Dr.Weider, Lew and Dr. Ben Gutierrez. Consider. 2013. Print.